Table
3. Comparison of scaling factors for optimal fits between Keeling
et al. [1998] for the data of Najjar
and Keeling [1997] and this work. The uncertainties (± SE)
on the scaling factors represent the standard errors to the fits. |
Station
code
|
Keeling
et al. [1998]
|
This
work
|
ALT
|
1.16
± 0.09
|
1.07
± 0.15
|
CBA
|
1.11
± 0.12
|
1.16
± 0.10
|
NWR
|
0.94
± 0.11
|
0.89
± 0.18
|
LJO
|
1.59
± 0.25
|
1.52
± 0.08
|
KUM
|
1.05
± 0.19
|
1.07
± 0.16
|
MLO
|
0.81
± 0.05
|
0.84
± 0.06
|
SMO
|
0.61
± 0.10
|
1.07
± 0.09
|
CGO
|
1.24
± 0.10
|
0.91
± 0.16
|
SPO
|
1.22
± 0.54
|
1.01
± 0.11
|
ALT,
NWR, CBA
|
1.15
± 0.05
|
1.09
± 0.09
|
CGO,
SPO
|
1.23
± 0.06
|
0.97
± 0.08
|
All
Stations
|
1.14
± 0.05
|
1.01
± 0.07
|
|
|